Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

MARTIN V. HERRING

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

KYLE J. MARTIN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SHONNA L. HERRING,
Respondent-Appellee.

NO. 31,123

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

November 3, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY, Ralph D. Shamas, District Judge

COUNSEL

Kyle J. Martin, Roswell, NM, Pro Se Appellant

Kraft & Hunter LLP, Dustin K. Hunter, Roswell, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: JAMES J. WECHSLER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

Father appeals the district court’s order awarding attorney fees and a witness fee to Mother. We proposed to affirm in part and reverse in part in a calendar notice. We have received no memorandum in opposition to our calendar notice and the time for doing so has passed. See Frick v. Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993) (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”). We therefore affirm the judgment for attorney fees in favor of Mother, we reverse the award of a witness fee to Mother, and we direct the district court to adjust the judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.