Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

MENDOZA V. HUBER

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

GEORGE MENDOZA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.

LUCINDA HUBER,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 33,913

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

November 25, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Manuel I. Arrieta, District Judge

COUNSEL

Kelly O’Connell, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant

The Pickett Law Firm, LLC, Stephen T. Swaim, Lawrence M. Pickett, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1}       Plaintiff appeals from a district court judgment resolving Plaintiff’s quiet title complaint in Defendant’s favor. We issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss for lack of a final order. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).

{2}       DISMISSED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.