Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
MONTOYA V. SANDOVAL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DAVID C. MONTOYA,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CARMELA MONTOYA
SANDOVAL,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 32,377
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 3, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY,
Eugenio S. Mathis, District Judge
COUNSEL
David C. Montoya, Las Vegas, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Carmela M. Montoya Sandoval, Las Vegas, NM, Pro Se Appellee
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECSLER, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
JAMES J. WECSLER, Judge