Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,258 documents
Decision Content
MUNIZ V. HALLMARK
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
NAPOLEON MUNIZ, JUDY MUNIZ
and CANDACE ARCHIBEQUE,
Individually and as Parent and Next
Friend of ELIJAH MUNIZ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMBER HALLMARK,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 32,848
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 16, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY, Violet
C. Otero, District Judge
COUNSEL
Michael J. Doyle, Los Lunas, NM, for Appellants
Orraj, Anderson & Obrey-Espinoza, Mark D. Trujillo, Carlos Espinoza, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Summary dismissal was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge