Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
PADILLA V. GUM
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MARCUS J. PADILLA,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
MELISSA GUM n/k/a
MELISSA TORRES,
Respondent-Appellant.
NO. 35,420
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 1, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SOCORRO COUNTY, James
T. Martin, District Judge
COUNSEL
Sun of Justice Law Firm, Jane Rocha De Gandara, Los Lunas, NM, for Appellee
L. Helen Bennett, P.C., L. Helen Bennett, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
{1} Mother appeals from the district court’s custody order, ruling, among other things, that Child should remain with Father in New Mexico and not move to California to live with Mother, Child’s stepfather, and his step- and half-siblings. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, acknowledging that this was a difficult custody decision. We saw no abuse of discretion, however, and proposed to affirm. Mother has responded to our calendar notice with a notice of intent, indicating that she does not intend to file a memorandum in opposition and will not oppose our proposed disposition.
{2} For the reasons stated in our notice, we affirm the district court.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge