Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
ORTHMAN V. ORTHMAN
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KENNETH ORTHMAN,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
KRISTI ORTHMAN,
Respondent-Appellant.
NO. 31,260
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
October 21, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF UNION COUNTY, John M.
Paternoster, District Judge
COUNSEL
Beck & Cooper, Robert O. Beck, Clayton, NM , for Appellee
Donald Schutte, Tucumcari, NM, for Appellant
Kamm & McConnell, LLC, Terrence R. Kamm, Raton, NM , Guardian Ad Litem
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and in fact, Appellant has filed a Consent to Proposed Disposition. Mandate shall issue forthwith.
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge