Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC V. JEFFERS

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.

SCOTT K. JEFFERS and
ATHENA JEFFERS,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 35,742

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 14, 2017


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, John F. Davis, District Judge

COUNSEL

Benjamin Feuchter, Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Scott K. Jeffers, Athena Jeffers, Rio Rancho, NM, Pro Se Appellees

JUDGES

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

AUTHOR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

{1}       Defendants-Appellants Scott K. Jeffers and Athena Jeffers (“Defendants”) appeal, in a self-represented capacity, from the district court’s orders denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff-Appellee Pennymac Loan Services (“Pennymac”). [RP 239, 241] Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. Pennymac has filed a response in support of our notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       Accordingly, we affirm.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.