Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
PRESCOTT V. MOYER MASONRY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
PATRICIA PRESCOTT, individually
and as Personal Representative for the
purposes of the Wrongful Death Act of
the Estate of DARRELL SHUPE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MOYER MASONRY & CONSTRUCTION,
INC., a New Mexico corporation, and
BRENT MOYER, individually,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 30,310
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 8, 2010
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, Don
Maddox, District Judge
COUNSEL
Fargason, Booth, St. Clair, Richards & Wilkins, LLP, Damon Richards, Lubbock, TX, for Appellant
Butt, Thornton & Baehr Law Firm, Michael Scott Owen, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge, MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge