Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

PSC OF NM V. RANCHO VISTA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
OF NEW MEXICO, a New Mexico
Corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT,
LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability
Company,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. 28,959

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 30, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, Louis P. McDonald, District Judge

COUNSEL

Keleher & McLeod PA, Thomas A. Domme, Albuquerque, NM, Miller Stratvert PA, Kirk R. Allen, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Rudolph B. Chavez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge

AUTHOR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

In this Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to dismiss Rancho Vista Development’s appeal as premature. Rancho Vista Development did not file a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s proposed disposition, and the time to do so has passed. Instead, Rancho Vista Development sent a letter to this Court, informing the Court that Rancho Vista Development did not intent to pursue its appeal. Rancho Vista Development did not, however, file a voluntary dismissal agreement with this Court pursuant to Rule 12-401(B) NMRA. Therefore, we now dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.