Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

REIMERS V. OLVER

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

PHILLIP C. REIMERS and SHARON
L. REIMERS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
OF ARIZONA,
Plaintiff-in-Intervention,
v.
MARK OLVER d/b/a MARK
OLVER CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
and DEBORAH OLVER d/b/a
MARK OLVER CONSTRUCTION,
LLC,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
BECKY MITCHENER, KAY MILLER,
and STEINBORN GMAC REAL ESTATE,
Defendants,
MARK OLVER and DEBORAH OLVER,
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
HECTOR PACHECO d/b/a INFINITY
ROOFING, BENINGO FLORES d/b/a
DURANGO PLASTERING, and
GONZALO RAYOS d/b/a MAJESTIC
BUILDERS,
Third-Party Defendants.

No. 30,347

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

August 18, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Jerald A. Valentine, District Judge

COUNSEL

Filosa & Filosa, Mark A. Filosa, Truth or Consequences, NM, for Appellees Reimers

O’Brien & Ulibarri, PC, Daniel O’Brien, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-in-Intervention

Hatcher & Tebo, P.A., Scott P. Hatcher, Santa Fe, NM, William A. Walker, Jr., PC, William A. Walker, Jr., Las Cruces, NM, for Appellants

Dixon, Scholl & Bailey, P.A., Gerald G. Dixon, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendants

Hector Pacheco, Las Cruces, NM, Pro Se Third-Party Defendant

Gonzalo Rayos, Las Cruces, NM, Pro Se Third-Party Defendant

JUDGES

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

WE CONCUR:

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.