Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
QUINTANA V. TAPIA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DIEGO QUINTANA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ABRAN TAPIA, LORI MARANGAKIS,
and MARY GORDON,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 31,011
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 15, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY,
Abigail Aragon, District Court Judge
COUNSEL
Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP, Karl H. Sommer, James R. Hawley, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Kurt Wihl, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
REVERSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge