Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
RICHARDS V. NM DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROBERT RICHARDS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES PLANNING
COUNCIL,
OFFICE OF GUARDIANSHIP, CRISTINE MARCHAND, Executive
Director, and
KAREN COURTNEY-PETERSON, Records Custodian,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 31,593
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 5, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Robert Richards, Santa Fe, NM, Pro se Appellant
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Stephen A. Vigil, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge