Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
ROMERO V. ALIRES
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
PAMELA ROMERO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LARRY ALIRES,
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
ERNESTO ROMERO,
Third-Party Defendant.
NO. 29,527
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 15, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY,
Abigail Aragon, District Judge
COUNSEL
Nancy Ann Richards, Las Vegas, NM, for Appellee
Larry Alires, Las Vegas, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge