Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents

Decision Content

RUDOLPH V. WW HEALTHCARE, LLC

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

ANITA JEAN RUDOLPH,
DECEASED, BY THE PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
WRONGFUL DEATH ESTATE,
PAUL RUDOLPH,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WW HEALTHCARE, LLC;
HORACE WINCHESTER; and
JERRY WILLIAMSON,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
MANOR ESTATES INC., D/B/A
PRINCETON PLACE; PRINCE &
LUFFEY, LLC, D/B/A PARAMOUNT
HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS;
and DANNY PRINCE,
Defendants,
and
WW HEALTHCARE, LLC;
HORACE WINCHESTER; and
JERRY WILLIAMSON,
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
foreign insurance company, and
VAN GILDER INSURANCE
CORPORATION, a foreign
insurance company,
Third-Party Defendants,
and
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Counterclaimant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff,
v.
WW HEALTHCARE, LLC;
HORACE WINCHESTER; JERRY
WILLIAMSON; AND MANOR
ESTATES, INC.,
Counterdefendants and Fourth-Party Defendants.

No. 33,188

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

August 18, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Carl J. Butkus, District Judge

COUNSEL

Harvey Law Firm, LLC, Jennifer J. Foote, Dusti D. Harvey, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Frank Alvarez, Dallas, Tx, Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A., Emil Kiehne, Spencer L. Edelman, Michelle A. Hernandez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants WW Healthcare, LLC

Jerry Williamson, Horace Winchester

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1}       Summary reversal and remand was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary reversal and remand has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our calendar notice.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTMANTE, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.