Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
SCHMIDT V. SCHMIDT
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
RENNALD C. SCHMIDT, Deceased,
PHYLLIS MARIE SCHMIDT and
BERNHARD JEROME WELZ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
WILLIAM SCHMIDT and
CARRIE SCHMIDT GLESS,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 33,559
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
October 23, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY, James
L. Sanchez, District Judge
COUNSEL
Phyllis Marie Schmidt, Los Lunas, NM, Bernhard Welz, Los Lunas, NM, Pro Se Appellants
Tax Estate & Business Law, Ltd., Thomas Smidt II, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Affirmed.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge