Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

SECRIST V. NMSPO

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DANIEL J. SECRIST and KEN
LONG, on their own behalf and
on behalf of a class of similarly-
situated State employees,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
NEW MEXICO STATE
PERSONNEL OFFICE, and
JUSTIN R. NAJAKA, New
Mexico State Personnel Director,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. A-1-CA-36950

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

June 5, 2018


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Shane Youtz, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees

SaucedoChavez PC, Christopher Saucedo, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge, DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1}       Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.