Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

SPROUL V. ROB & CHARLIES

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

ARCHIBALD A. SPROUL and
LISA MCFADDEN SPROUL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ROB & CHARLIES, INC.,
GT BICYCLES, INC., PACIFIC CYCLES, INC., and ISHIWATA,
Defendants,
and
ROB & CHARLIES, INC.,
Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOY INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.,
Third Party Defendant-Appellee,
and
J&B IMPORTS, INC., QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC.,
and DOREL INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Third Party Defendants.

NO. 31,125

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

October 6, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge

COUNSEL

Kenneth C. Downes & Associates, P.C., Kenneth C. Downes, Corrales, NM, Steven C. Henry, Corrales, NM, for Plaintiffs

Hatcher & Tebo, P.A., Scott P. Hatcher, Christopher J. Tebo, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

McClaugherty & Silver, P.C., Joe L. McClaugherty, Tamara Safarik, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Guebert Bruckner, P.C., Terry Guebert, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant/Third Party Defendant

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.