Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State ex rel. Human Servs. Dep't v. Moore

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 12/18/2013
Docket Numbers 33,072
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; RODERICK T. KENNEDY; LINDA M. VANZI
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,267 documents

Decision Content

STATE EX REL. HUMAN SERVS. DEPT. V. MOORE

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, EX REL.
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
STATE OF MAINE, and LAURETTA
SEAY,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
LUKE ALLEN MOORE,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 33,072

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

December 18, 2013


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G.W. Shoobridge, District Judge

COUNSEL

New Mexico Human Services Department, Joan McMahon, Special Assistant Attorney General, Hobbs, NM, for Appellees

Luke A. Moore, Hobbs, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       AFFIRMED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.