Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
State v. Hill - cited by 38 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ARENAS

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAMIAN ARENAS,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. A-1-CA-36551

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 24, 2018


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Karen L. Townsend, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge, STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals from his conviction for felony DWI, entered pursuant to a conditional plea, wherein he reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm relying, in part, on State v. Hill, 2005-NMCA-143, ¶ 12, 138 N.M. 693, 125 P.2d 1175. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition requesting that this Court revisit our holding in Hill. However, given that our holding in Hill was premised on binding New Mexico Supreme Court precedent, we decline to revisit that holding. As a result, we conclude that Defendant has not demonstrated a speedy trial violation. Accordingly, we affirm.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.