Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. BACA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ADELINA BACA
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 35,455

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

August 10, 2016


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Alisa Ann Hadfield, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant Adelina Baca appeals from the district court’s affirmance of her conviction after a bench trial in metropolitan court for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to agree with and adopt the district court’s memorandum opinion and affirm Defendant’s conviction. Defendant filed a notice that she will not file a memorandum in opposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and herein, and for the reasons articulated in the memorandum opinion of the district court, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.