Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. CLAY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EDWARD A. CLAY,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 32,604
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 9, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOA ANA COUNTY, Susan
M. Riedel, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Pranava Upadrashta, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender, Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant appealed his conviction for residential burglary. Our third calendar notice proposed to affirm his conviction. In response, Defendant has filed a notice indicating he will not file a memorandum in opposition to our latest calendar notice, but relies on the facts, authorities, and arguments contained in his initial memorandum in opposition. We remain convinced that the proposed disposition set out in our third calendar notice is correct. Therefore, for the reasons discussed in that notice, we affirm the district court’s judgment and sentence in this case.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge