Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. DEANNA H.

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DEANNA H.,
Child-Appellant.

No. 34,295

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 1, 2015


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY, Lisa B. Riley, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Jane A. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: JAMES J. WECHSLER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1}     Child Deanna H. appeals from the Children’s Court order revoking her probation and committing her to the Children, Youth and Families Department for a period not to exceed one year. This Court issued a calendar notice, proposing to reverse and remand to the Children’s Court for a new hearing on the State’s petition to revoke Child’s probation. The State filed a response to our notice stating that it “agrees with the Court’s proposal to reverse and remand for a new hearing on the petition to revoke [Child’s] probation.” Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the State’s petition to revoke Child’s probation.

{2}     IT IS SO ORDERED.

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.