Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. DEVONTENNO

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.

ANTHONY DEVONTENNO,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 33,239

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 18, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY, William A. Sanchez, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Frederick D. Jones, Jr., Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, Chief Judge.

{1}       Anthony Devontenno (Defendant) appeals an order of unsatisfactory discharge from probation. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, in which we proposed to reverse. The State has filed a notice that it does not intend to oppose summary reversal, and Defendant has filed a memorandum in support. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse and remand for entry of an order of satisfactory discharge.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED. MANDATE SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.