Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. FARRELL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
ORIANA FARRELL,
Defendant-Applicant.
No. 33,900
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 25, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, John M.
Paternoster, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Respondent
Alan Maestas Law Office, P.C., Alan H. Maestas, Kathryn J. Hardy, Taos, NM, for Applicant
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Defendant filed an application for interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s refusal to dismiss the indictment brought against Defendant. We granted the application and issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to reverse. The State has filed a response indicating it is unable to offer any additional facts or legal argument to challenge the proposed disposition. The State also requests issuance of an expedited mandate, and Defendant concurs in that request. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice, we reverse the district court’s decision in this case. Mandate shall issue immediately.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge