Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,267 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. FOLLINGSTAD
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DEBORAH FOLLINGSTAD,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 35,448
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 28, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Brett R. Loveless, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Deborah Follingstad, San Francisco, CA, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge