Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. GARCIA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JOSE GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 31,695
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 9, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY,
William C. Birdsall, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
The Rio Law Firm, Francis J. Rio, III, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge