Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,423 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. GARCIA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH ANTHONY GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellee.
NO. 30,807
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 9, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Lisa
C. Schultz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Andrew S. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Law Offices of Michael L. Stout, Michael L. Stout, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge.
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
The State appeals the district court order granting a new trial to Defendant. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. In response, the State filed a “Notice of Non-Intention to File Memorandum in Response to Notice of Proposed Summary Disposition.” Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge