Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ISLAS

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
IANN ISLAS,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. 35,737

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

February 13, 2017


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Briana H. Zamora, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Josephine H. Ford, Assistant Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant-Appellant Iann Islas (Defendant) has sought to appeal his conviction of driving while intoxicated (DWI). We previously issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, we remain unpersuaded.

{2}       In his memorandum in opposition, Defendant presents no new arguments but reiterates his position that the DWI roadblock pursuant to which he was seized was unconstitutional and that the results of his breath alcohol test were admitted in error. [MIO 2-5] We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s arguments. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.