Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. JAKSHA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW JAKSHA,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 33,442
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 16, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G.
Shoobridge, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Fredlund & Bryan, LLC, Jon C. Fredlund, Hobbs, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge