Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. JOE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EMERSON JOE
a/k/a NI’I NE’E,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 34,614
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 20, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Charles W. Brown, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Emerson Joe, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Chief Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge