Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. KEISEAN A.

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KEISEAN A.,
Child-Appellant.

NO. A-1-CA-36772

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 1, 2018


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, John J. Romero, Jr., District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Marko David Hananel, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Chelsea Van Deventer, Assistant Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge, EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1}       Child-Appellant Keisean A. (Child) appeals from the district court’s judgment and disposition entered following Child’s conditional plea. [RP 51, 52; DS 1] Child raised the central contention the district court erred in denying Child’s motion to dismiss based on expiration of the time limit for trial of a child in custody. [DS 3-4] This Court issued a notice proposing to summarily reverse. [CN 1, 4] The State filed a response indicating it will not file a memorandum in opposition to our notice of proposed disposition. Therefore, based on the reasons set forth in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we reverse.

            IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.