Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,366 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. ORTEGA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BROOKLIN ORTEGA,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 33,117
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 12, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Kenneth H. Martinez, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, M. Victoria Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender, Sergio Viscoli, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant-Appellant Brooklin Ortega (Defendant) has filed an application for interlocutory appeal, seeking review of the denial of her pretrial motion to suppress. On September 23, 2013, we granted the application and issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to reverse and remand. The State has filed a response, which is accepted as timely, indicating that it does not oppose our proposed summary disposition.
{2} Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge