Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. ROYBAL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EUGENIO ROYBAL,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 34,854
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 3, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Sarah C.
Backus, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Sergio Viscoli, Appellate Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} REVERSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge