Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. SANCHEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HAROLD SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 28,722
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 16, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY, Charles
C. Currier, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
The Law Offices of Nancy L. Simmons, P.C., Nancy L. Simmons, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Defendant appeals a conviction on several drug related charges. After briefing on the general calendar, the case was removed from the general calendar and assigned to the summary calendar for summary affirmance. Defendant has timely responded and indicated that he will rest on his brief in chief. We have considered the arguments made in the brief and not being persuaded we affirm for the reasons stated in the second calendar notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge