Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. TARIN
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR TARIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 29,740
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 24, 2010
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, Don Maddox,
District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Templeman and Crutchfield, C. Barry Crutchfield, Lovington, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge