Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. VALDEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MANUEL VALDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 35,740
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 6, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY,
Fernando R. Macias, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appeal his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We previously issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, we remain unpersuaded.
{2} In his memorandum in opposition, Defendant presents no new arguments but reiterates his position that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. [MIO 2-5] We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s argument. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge