Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. VAN WINKLE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PHILBERT VANWINKLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 36,126
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 5, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Karen
L. Townsend, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Maris Veidemanis, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZAMORA, Judge.
{1} Defendant Philbert Vanwinkle appeals from his convictions for aggravated burglary and tampering with evidence following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and his entry of a conditional guilty plea. [DS 2; RP 48, 51, 67, 79] This Court issued a notice proposing to summarily reverse. [CN 1, 2, 8] The State has filed a response informing this Court it does not intend to file a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. Therefore, based on the reasons set forth in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we reverse.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge