Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Chapter 30 - Criminal Offenses - cited by 5,731 documents
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. YOINGCO

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ROLAND WAYNE YOINGCO,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 34,304

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 8, 2015


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY, Steven L. Bell, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Margaret E. McLean, Assistant Attorney General, Joel Jacobsen, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Hennighausen & Olsen, L.L.P., Kenneth B. Wilson, Jeff Grandjean, Roswell, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

AUTHOR: JAMES J. WECHSLER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1}       Defendant Roland Yoingco appeals from his judgment and sentence, entered pursuant to a jury trial at which Defendant was found guilty of aggravated burglary, pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-4 (1963). We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to reverse and remand. The State has filed a response, indicating that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice, we reverse Defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.