Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Chapter 31 - Criminal Procedure - cited by 3,638 documents
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ZUNIGA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GERALD RAY ZUNIGA,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. 29,906

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 6, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Lisa C. Schultz, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Max Shepherd, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Loni J. Hodge, Assistant Public Defender, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

Defendant has appealed from the revocation of his probation, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (2003). We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to reverse and remand for resentencing. The State has filed a responsive document entitled “Memorandum in Opposition,” which expresses no opposition to our proposal to reverse for want of an adequate showing below, and which expresses agreement with our proposal to remand for resentencing.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.