Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

TORRES V. TORRES

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

FRANCES TORRES,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH TORRES,
Respondent-Appellant.

NO. 30,111

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 7, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Sheri A. Raphaelson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Brigitte Lotze law Office, Brigitte Lotze, Toas, NM, for Appellee

Kelan Emery, Taos, NM, Helen L. Bennett, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

Respondent appeals several rulings in this domestic relations matter. In this Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to dismiss for lack of a final order. Respondent has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary dismissal of the case, as well as a motion that asks the Court to retain the record proper for use in any appeal that is filed once a final order is entered.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of a final order and we grant Respondent’s motion to retain the record proper. As this appeal has been dismissed, in any subsequent appeal Respondent may wish to file, he will have to file a new notice of appeal and docketing statement, and will have to supplement the record in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.