Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
TRUJILLO V. STATE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MANUEL TRUJILLO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Defendant-Appellee,
NO. 31,071
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 15, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Alan
M. Malott, District Court Judge
COUNSEL
Manuel Trujillo, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Jarmie & Associates, Mark D. Jarmie, Albuquerque, NM, Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. In addition, Defendant has filed a memorandum in support of the proposed disposition that we found persuasive.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge