Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

VILLA V. MOLINA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DANIEL J. VILLA,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.

NANCY MOLINA,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 33,880

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

November 24, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY, Daniel Viramontes, District Judge

COUNSEL

DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC, Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez, Deming, NM, for Appellant

Couture Law, Rosalie Fragoso, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1}       Petitioner appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for custody of his minor child. We issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm. Respondent filed a memorandum in support; Petitioner has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).

{2}       AFFIRMED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.