Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
WILCOX LAW FIRM V. ESTATE OF ORLOWSKY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE
OF ELI ORLOWSKY, Deceased,
WILCOX LAW FIRM, P.C.,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF ELI ORLOWSKY,
DOUGLAS ORLOWSKY, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 31,870
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 9, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Carl
J. Butkus, District Judge
COUNSEL
Wilcox Law Firm, P.C., Vickie R. Wilcox, James A. Noel, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Karl H. Roepke, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition filed on March 13, 2012. Claimant filed a memorandum in opposition to proposed summary disposition on April 2, 2012. Summary affirmance was proposed again for the reasons stated in the second notice of proposed summary disposition filed on May 9, 2012. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge