Court of Appeals of New Mexico

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

MONICA BOEHMER and STEVE KEMP,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
DEVELOPMENT, INC., and MICHAEL S. NEAS,
Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
BOTTOM DRAWER, LLC; C.M. LATH AND
PLASTER, INC.; PIONEER PAVING &
GRADING, INC.; STOREFRONT SPECIALTIES
& GLAZING, LLC; VILLANUEVA GRANITE &
TILE, INC.; ROBERT UFFER d/b/a WHOLESALE
MIRROR - EASTERNGATE GLASS, INC.;
H. GLENN MURRAY and JANE DOE MURRAY;
H. GLENN MURRAY & ASSOC.; JOHN DOES
I-X; JANE DOES I-X; WHITE CORPORATIONS
I-X; BLACK PARTNERSHIPS I-X; and GRAY
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES I-X,
Third-Party Defendants.

No. A-1-CA-37164

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

July 31, 2018

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Clay Campbell, District Judge

COUNSEL

Crowley & Gribble, PC, Clayton E. Crowley, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants

Resnick & Louis, P.C., Emily Dotson, Albuquerque, NM, for Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., David W. Buntin, Edward Ricco, Albuquerque, NM, for Third-Party Defendant C. M. Lath and Plaster, Inc.

Eaton Law Office, P.C., Michael G. Smith, Albuquerque, NM, for Third-Party Defendants H. Glenn Murray and Jane Doe Murray; and H. Glenn Murray & Assoc.

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge.

{1}       Plaintiffs Monica Boehmer and Steve Kemp appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for reinstatement and order denying their motion to recuse. In this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we proposed to summarily dismiss for lack of a final order. Plaintiffs filed a concurrence to proposed summary disposition, stating that they “concur with the Notice, Proposed Summary Disposition[.]” [MIS 1] Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and herein, we dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge