Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
WATKINS V. WATKINS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
LEIGH WATKINS,
n/k/a LEIGH SCHUTZBERGER,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM WATKINS,
Respondent,
and
WILLIAM DOANE WATKINS and
MARGARET ANN WATKINS,
Intervenors-Appellants,
and
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, HUMAN
SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
Intervenor.
No. A-1-CA-37179
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 10, 2018
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Jane
C. Levy, District Judge
COUNSEL
Law Offices of Dorene A. Kuffer, P.C., Dorene A. Kuffer, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Law Offices of Lynda Latta, LLC, Darin Kyle McDougall, Albuquerque, NM, for Respondent
Michael L. Danoff, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge, HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge