Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
CONAGRA FOODS V. NM TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
CONAGRA FOODS FOOD
INGREDIENTS CO. INC.,
Protestant-Appellee,
v.
NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Respondent-Appellant.
A-1-CA-36871
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 10, 2019
APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE, Brian
VanDenzen, Hearing Officer
COUNSEL
Gallagher & Kennedy, PA, Gene F. Creely, II, Santa Fe, NM, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, Fred O. Marcus, Chicago, ILL, for Appellee
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, Legal Services Bureau, Peter A. Breen, Special Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge