Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ANDERSON

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. A-1-CA-37316

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 15, 2019


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Daniel A. Bryant, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, C. David Henderson, Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the fugitive complaint. This Court’s calendar notice proposed summary dismissal on the basis that the district court’s order denying the motion to dismiss the fugitive complaint is not a final, appealable order. Defense counsel filed a memorandum in support of summary dismissal conceding that the order is not final. [MIS 1] Defense counsel states that to the extent Defendant argued that the challenged order improperly deprived him of his liberty, proceedings to obtain his release continued after the notice of appeal was filed. [MIS 2] Defense counsel further indicates that to his knowledge, Defendant’s release was obtained, providing the remedy sought on appeal and rendering the issues raised in the docketing statement moot. [MIS 1] Accordingly, for these reasons, and those stated in the notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss the appeal.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.