Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
BLOOM V. BOADWINE
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
TARA JOY BLOOM,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL STEPHEN BOADWINE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. A-1-CA-37652
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 30, 2019
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge
COUNSEL
Tara Joy Bloom, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Michael Stephen Boadwine, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant.
JUDGES
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance in part and remand to the district court for clarification was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the notice of summary disposition has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMAND TO DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARIFICATION.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge