Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-37946

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

XAVIER LOVING,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY
Fred T. Van Soelen, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
M. Victoria Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
Albuquerque, NM

for  Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
Will O’Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZAMORA, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals from his convictions for  shooting at a dwelling or occupied structure, aggravated assault with a firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm. This Court’s second notice proposed to reverse Defendant’s conviction for shooting at a dwelling, and to affirm the remaining convictions. Defendant filed a memorandum in partial opposition, and the State filed a notice of intent not to file a memorandum in opposition, to the proposed disposition. Relying on the facts, authorities, and arguments in the docketing statement, Defendant continues to oppose affirmance of his convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm and felon in possession of a firearm. [MIO 1] Defendant’s memorandum in opposition does not, however, raise any new arguments or authority to persuade this Court that reversal is warranted. Thus, for the reasons stated in our second notice of proposed disposition, we reverse Defendant’s conviction for shooting at a dwelling and affirm the remaining convictions.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.