Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Chapter 31 - Criminal Procedure - cited by 3,582 documents
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,267 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38844

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MOSES MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY
Fred T. Van Soelen, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

Benjamin L. Lammons, Assistant Attorney General

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals from the district court’s order revoking his probation and sentencing him to 285 days in a detention center, a sentence that included absconder time. We issued a notice proposing to summarily reverse and remand for resentencing on grounds that the district court erred by concluding that Defendant absconded and therefore was not entitled to credit against his probation for the full time he served. The State has filed a response to our notice, in which it agrees that insufficient evidence was presented that Defendant was a fugitive or that his probation revocation warrant could be served from the date of its issuance to the date of its execution, as required to deny probation credit under NMSA 1978, Section 31-21-15(B), (C) (2016). [Response 1] On this basis, the State informed this Court that it does not oppose our notice proposing summary reversal. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our notice, we reverse the district court’s order revoking Defendant’s probation and remand for resentencing.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.